Not enough backing?

Posted by TGWILD1

12 Comments

  1. What I’ve done in the past is fill up the backing and periodically check the fit with the coiled up new fly line by just holding the bundle in place on the spool. Not that it probably matters too much to be underspooled, but yes I’d say not enough backing.

  2. Too little is, for freshwater reels, much better than too much. I like there to be about a quarter inch gap between fly line and frame to account for less than perfect wraps in the wild.

    On a 3 wt odds are you’ll never see that backing on the water anyway.

    The only effect you would really see is having to crank a few more times to reel in, and tighter coils in cold weather.

  3. Tactical_Axolotl on

    That reel looks tiny, which makes me think you’re not fishing for something powerful, which makes me say that that is enough. If you were chasing carp, salmon, steelhead, or saltwater, I would say it’s missing a lot of

  4. I’ve always been told 3-5 weight 25-50 yards of backing. 6-8 weight 50-80 anything over 9 weight 80-100 yards of backing.

  5. I would agree with “good enough” and better too little than too much. I personally don’t like a real full spool, too easy to get uneven distribution and then a jammed reel.
    To me that looks perfect

  6. My 3wt is the same on my little click reel and I’ve just been too lazy to fix it. Doesn’t hurt anything having too little imo just looks weird.

  7. IMO yes, I’d add more. When I ordered my Battenkill the shop spooled it up exactly like that. Problem with that little of backing is the arbor was so small the line was getting tons of memory from being wound so tight. Re-spooled it with a lot more backing enlarging the arbor and it resolved the issue.

    People always talk about no need for much backing for small fish, which is true, but more backing has other benefits than just for fighting fish.

Leave A Reply